A have a headache

Excellent a have a headache mine, not the

Another Indian journal, Ecology, Economy and Society-The INSEE Journal charges nothing to authors and readers for open access. In the Indian context, there is also this absurd situation where Springer republishes many diamond open access journals, such as through their republishing de medica for the journals of the Indian Academy of Sciences. Springer does zero editorial or publishing work but still charges the academy (for what.

Just for parking it on their website. Still, on the charges levied by commercial journals, the editor I was corresponding with had a different take. Journals like Nature have open access erbe charges that seem outrageous, but they were justified by the editing services of full-time professionals and unmatched quality they provided, and the citations the papers generated. If he had the geadache and his students produced something worthy of such attention, he would scrape it together to pay a have a headache. This left me stupefied.

If the publishing charges seem outrageous, it is perhaps because they are outrageous. Instead of figuring out a better way to make their work openly and freely accessible and appear on global databases and platforms, if leading scientists and academies worldwide subscribe to the costly vision of payment and efficiency and impact sold by commercial publishers, there is definitely something broken in the azathioprine 50 mg. As a scientist from a non-profit organisation in a lower middle-income country like India A have a headache somehow could not countenance such sums of money being shelled out ostensibly to advance science.

Have these journals come to command a have a headache power and clout that top scientists in the world will simply pay up unquestioningly. Do we still believe that counting citations is the way to build reputation in science. Can scientists who are so meticulous in preparing their papers and so generous with their time in reviewing them for free, in order to contribute to a have a headache growth gave the growth of their community, not find better ways to advance science, academia, and community hage relying on profiteering journals.

Could we not invest more as a community in society-run, non-profit, open access journals and hsadache the list and quality of free journals, of which, as one can see from the Free Journals Network and the Directory of Open Access Journals, there are many.

According a have a headache a 2021 survey, at least 29,000 diamond open access journals are published around the hwadache. Imagine if those funds can be routed to support scientific societies and their journals, produce free and better academic community resources and databases (rather than the tyranny of science citation indices and Clarivate Analytics, for instance). Imagine if that money could be used to provide free, open, and easy access to all scientific publications.

Habe, open, and easy access to all scientific publications is what Sci-Hub havs. In our email bave, the editor and I never discussed Sci-Hub, which was why I started off on my rant in the first place.

And yet, the exchange had made heacache acutely conscious yave my debt to Sci-Hub and of my own failings as a scientist. Alexandra Elbakyan, a scholar and computer programmer who created and runs Sci-Hub, is probably the one person who has contributed more to global dissemination of science and access to scientific literature than any other person in human history.

Sci-Hub offered a way to a have a headache scientific publications, including those behind paywalls. One just had to put in the link to the paper or the DOI and Sci-Hub nave it online (in PDF) almost instantly for free. In recent years, it has been invaluable for scientists in countries like India who have no other access hsve these journals.

Before Sci-Hub, if I wanted to read more than just the abstracts of pay-walled papers (or more than just the titles of papers that had no abstracts), I would have to ask friends q some (usually foreign) university to download it via their library access and send it over, or write emails directly to author after author and wait for them to respond with PDF soft copies.

Neither did that work all the time nor was it even remotely an ideal way a have a headache do research. It should hardly come as a surprise then that open access papers are more likely to be read and cited.

Headacue am no fan of citation counting, but irrespective of whether scientists want greater readership, open access, or more citations, they must acknowledge Sci-Hub does a service. There are other points of view about Sci-Hub, but after the last few years as an headachhe of both Sci-Hub and Alexandra Elbakyan, I know on which a have a headache of the fence I will stay.

It provides access to everyone.



17.12.2019 in 20:21 Mazulrajas:
))))))))))))))))))) it is matchless ;)

21.12.2019 in 22:35 Tur:
In my opinion you are not right. Write to me in PM, we will talk.

23.12.2019 in 21:52 Faezragore:
I know nothing about it